Justice Department deems ACA provisions unconstitutional

The Trump administration told a federal court last week that it would no longer defend provisions of the Affordable Care Act aimed at protecting consumers with pre-existing medical conditions (Source: “Justice Dept. Says Crucial Provisions of Obamacare Are Unconstitutional,” New York Times, June 7, 2018).

Under those provisions of the law, insurance companies cannot deny coverage or charge higher rates to people with pre-existing conditions. The Justice Department said the provisions were part of an unconstitutional scheme that required most Americans to carry health insurance.

In a court case filed by Texas and 19 other states, the Justice Department said in a brief on Thursday that the requirement for people to have insurance — the individual mandate — was unconstitutional.

A definitive court ruling could be months away and appeals of any decision could take many more months, during which the law is likely to stay in effect.

The Supreme Court upheld the individual mandate in 2012 as an exercise of the government’s power to tax. But since Congress repealed the tax last year, the mandate and the law’s consumer protections can no longer be justified, the Justice Department said.

Attend HPIO's 2025 Health Policy Summit on Oct. 9, 2025

With limited resources and growing need, investing in policies that deliver the greatest impact is essential. This event will highlight strategies that improve health and wellbeing while reducing healthcare spending. Speakers will provide evidence-informed research responsive to today’s political climate, focusing on what works and why it matters now more than ever.

Register now